BuildLaw Issue 23

February 2016

Content

  • An expert horror story: Van Oord UK Limited and SICIM Roadbridge Limited v Allseas UK Limited [2015] EWHC 3074 (TCC)
  • The “same or substantially the same” dispute: further Court of Appeal guidance
  • Architect found negligent in failing to follow client’s instructions – a lesson in communication
  • Exclusion and limitation clauses in construction contracts – recent developments
  • Sanson v Ebert
  • Retentions under the spotlight
  • With friends like these… Burgess v Lejonvarn: a parable for construction professionals
  • Case in Brief: BSC Construction Ltd v Withers [2015] NZHC 1988

Related issues