Resolve your building and construction disputes quickly and cost effectively

We offer a full range of private dispute resolution processes to resolve your building or construction dispute. If you are a homeowner, principal, builder, contractor, subcontractor, tradie, or related professional (e.g. architect, designer, QS) and whether you work on residential, commercial, or infrastructure projects, we can help you identify the process that best meets your needs.

Our processes

We offer adjudication under the Construction Contracts Act 2002 (the CCA). We also offer a full range of other dispute resolution processes, including mediation, expert determination, arbitration, arb-med, contractual adjudication, and dispute review boards. We can tailor our processes to the dispute and your needs.

Engage with us

Reach out today to discuss your options or to start the process.

Options

We can help you choose the process that best meets your needs from our range of dispute resolution process options

CCA Adjudication

Mediation

Arbitration

Arb-Med

Expert Determination

Contractual Adjudication

Dispute Review Boards

Types of disputes BDT resolves

Building Disputes

Painting Disputes

Plumbing Disputes

Concrete Disputes

Joinery Disputes

Design Work Disputes

Engineering Disputes

Flooring Disputes

Electrical Disputes

Landscaping Disputes

Quantity Surveyor Disputes

Drainage Disputes

Tiling Disputes

Roofing Disputes

Waterproofing Disputes

Recognised and respected as the leading independent dispute resolution provider for over 30 years

Latest news and articles

For the latest updates, news, and articles about dispute resolution and our services, please visit our Knowledge Hub. We regularly update this section with insightful and informative content that can help you better understand the dispute resolution landscape.

General

A doctrine of “temporary disconformity”? Although intrigued, the Court of Appeal will not investigate further  

The New Zealand Court of Appeal (the Court) has declined a construction company’s application for leave to appeal a decision of the High Court.
In Van den Anker Construction Limited v Wilson McKay Trustee Company Limited[1], the Court heard arguments from the construction company, Van Den Anker Construction Limited (VDAC), that the Court should consider the case on public importance grounds.
VDAC argued that a doctrine of “temporary disconformity” applied. In considering the matter, the Court could help answer an open question about a doctrine that may or may not have currency in New Zealand. Despite somewhat agreeing with VDAC, the Court found that such a doctrine, if it existed, would not apply to the facts anyway.

Read More »

Note: Please note that the information contained in these articles is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and is not intended as legal advice. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The content may not reflect current legal developments and is subject to revision without notice.

Skip to content