BuildLaw Issue 29

September 2017

Content

  • Supreme Court clarifies meaning of ‘due debts’ in voidable transaction regime
  • EMT Hojgaard: Supreme Court rules on fitness for purpose dispute
  • NEC Contracts how not to amend them
  • Erith v Murphy: oral contracts and knowing who you are contracting with
  • The prevention principle and implied duty of good faith in construction contracts
  • Oral construction contracts: RCS Contractors Ltd v Conway, a costly affair
  • How “final and binding” is an expert determination?
  • Granting extensions of time in construction contracts – a duty of good faith may apply

Related issues