The Government proposed changes to the rules that allowed property owners to claim interest on loans used for residential properties as an expense against their income from those properties. These rules are set to take effect in just three days, on 1 October 2021.
When the policy was announced back in March, the Government explained that interest deductions will not be available on residential investment property acquired on or after 27 March 2021, but there would be exemptions for “new build” homes. However, no further details on the exemptions were available – until today.
This morning, Revenue Minister Parker proposed changes that clarify that a home stays “new” for for 20 years after it has received its code compliance certificate. This means that home owners will be able to buy and sell “new” homes and keep the exemption status.
However, this may not be the end. Housing Minister Megan Woods said that the new build exemption also applied to purpose-built rentals, but suggested she might look at changing the rules further (NZ Herald). While the government says that these new rules have been consulted on, National Party shadow treasurer Andrew Bayly has called it “last-minute” (Stuff).
The finer detail of the proposal is contained in new subpart DH set out in the Supplementary Order Paper proposing changes to the unassumingly-named Taxation (Annual Rates for2021-22, GST, and Remedial Matters) Bill, and will be considered by the Finance and Expenditure select committee (Beehive).
Obstructed view review
The losing streak is over: English rugby wins… right to bring claim against contractor
Keep calm and carry on: English Court of Appeal overturns controversial High Court ruling and clarifies guiding principles in serial adjudications
Moving home
Big loss for insurer in legal battle with Napier Council over leaky building clause
BuildLaw Issue 51
Take a rain cheque – Full Federal Court of Australia reads common sense into insurance policy
Case update: English Court of Appeal confirms ‘useless’ ADR procedure too uncertain to enforce
English Court of Appeal confirms ‘useless’ ADR procedure too uncertain to enforce
Disgruntled builders lose defective cladding dispute
BuildLaw Issue 50
Craftiness is not an abuse of process
Privileged glimpses: Curtain falls on art gallery’s nuisance ‘human zoo’ exhibit
Waiver and estoppel arguments raised in interim payment dispute
Doing business in Australia? Then you need to know when you still might have to pick up the whole tab
Parliament passes sweeping amendments to construction payment regime
BuildLaw Issue 49
Builder terminates contract with a “sorry mate…costs are going through the roof”
Ripping up the Resource Management Act
To bespoke or too bespoke – the case of an ADR clause that couldn’t be enforced
The Court of Appeal sounds the all clear and it’s business as usual under the CCA: so file a payment schedule or pay up!
BuildLaw Issue 48
Labelling an image as an ‘artist impression’ was found not to give a developer artistic licence in a claim of misleading and deceptive conduct over an ‘off-the-plan’ premium apartment
Fire risk – defective cladding litigation heats up
BuildLaw Issue 47
WA Supreme Court finds no implied licence to use home design plan
Overhaul coming to the regulation of engineers
Expert “evidence” needs to be more than just bald assertions to win the day
An adjudicator’s decision on a construction contract is definitely worth the paper it’s written on!
You break it you bought it: Supreme Court confirms you can’t cancel a contract for failure to satisfy a condition if your own behaviour had a material effect on the failure
BuildLaw Issue 46
Vicarious liability and subcontractors
Limitation for payment claims under construction contracts
Extensions of time in construction contracts
BuildLaw Issue 45
Testing the waters: New South Wales Supreme Court considers the prevention principle
Construction contract or product warranty? Not all collateral warranty disputes can be adjudicated
When you think the amount of your personal guarantee had a limit – but it didn’t.
BuildLaw Issue 44
Leaky Home Case: Failure to obtain a building report results in reduction of damages for contributory negligence
Do payment claims for retention money ‘fit’ with the standard terms of contract in New Zealand?
Resolving Construction Disputes – Is Adjudication a Good Option?
BuildLaw Issue 43
Cost certainty for resolving building and construction disputes: Extension to the BDT Adjudication Low Value Claim Scheme
Construction Contracts – Enforcement of Debts Due and Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses
The Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses
Building and Construction Under COVID-19 Alert Level 4
Class-action lawsuit against Harditex cladding fails
What types of disputes can be referred to adjudication?
Important Guidance on Contract Interpretation Issued by the Supreme Court
Recent Posts
- AMENDED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NZS 3910:2023
- Obstructed view review
- The losing streak is over: English rugby wins… right to bring claim against contractor
- Keep calm and carry on: English Court of Appeal overturns controversial High Court ruling and clarifies guiding principles in serial adjudications
- Moving home
Archives
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- November 2020
- September 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- June 2017
- March 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016